PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA STUDI KASUS PERKARA PIDANA NO. 07/PID-SUS-ANAK/2017/PN.PDG

Dewi Elvi Susanti


Dewi Elvi Susanti(1*)

(1) Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Andalas
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


This study illustrates the basis and consideration of public prosecutors and judges in convicting children as perpetrators of crimes in a letter of claim and decision. There were two issues that would be examined, namely: a) What is the basis and consideration of the Public Prosecutor to file a complaint against the Child as a criminal in a case Number: 07/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/Pn.Pdg, b) What is the basis and consideration of the Judge in making a decision on the Child as a criminal offender in the decision Number: 07/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/Pn.Pdg, To discuss this problem a normative juridical method is used. From the results of the research obtained answers, a) the basis of the public prosecutor to file a claim against a child is Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning the Juvenile Court and Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Justice System, and several Circular of the Indonesian Attorney General, while prosecutor's consideration General filed a claim in court No. 07/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/Pn.Pdg was the fulfillment of the elements of the article being charged, things that incriminate and alleviate children's actions, the condition of parents of children, recommendations of correctional facilities (Bapas), paying attention to the interests of the community, victims and perpetrator; b) the basis of the judge in making a decision in case No. 07/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/Pn.Pdg was Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System of Children and was Law Number 3 of 1997 concerning Juvenile Courts. There were 2 (two) considerations the judge handed down the decision in case No. 07/Pid.Sus-Anak/2017/Pn.Pdg are juridical considerations and non-juridical considerations.

Keywords


Child; Actor; Crime; Penalty.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku-buku:

Deni Setyo Bagus Yuherawan, 2009, Dekontruksi Azas Legalitas Hukum Pidana, Setara Press, Surabaya.

Harkristuti Harkrisnowo, Tantangan dan Agenda Hak-Hak Anak, Jakarta, Newsletter Komisi Hukum Nasional, Edisi Februari 2002

Mukti Arto, 2004, Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta.

Muladi, 1995, Kapita Selekta Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

M. Nasir Djamil, 2015, (Pimpinan Panja Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Komisi III DPR RI), Anak Bukan untuk Dihukum, Sinar Grafika,

Maidin Gultom, 2014, Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak, Refka Aditama.

Zainal Abidin, 2005, Pemidanaan, Pidana dan Tindakan Dalam Rancangan KUHP, Position Paper Advokasi RUU KUHP seri 3, ELSAM, Jakarta.

Jurnal:

Wiwik Afifah, Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Anak Konfilik Hukum, Vol 10, No. 19, Hal 48-62, Februari 2015.

Olvina Kartika Mamentu, Peran Pasal 2 Undang-undang Nomor 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak terhadap Anak yang berkonflik Hukum, Lex Crimen Vol IV/No.2/April/2015

Adi Hardiyanto Wicaksono, Pujiyono, Kebijaksanaan Pelasanaan Diversi sebagai Perlindungan Bagi Anak yang Berkonflik Hukum pada tingkat Penuntutan di Kejaksaan Negeri Kudus, 2015, Jurnal Law Reform, Volume 11, Nomor 1. 2015.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan:

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor: 35 tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 23 tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak (LNRI tahun 2014 Nomor 297)

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v4i2.103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Dewi Elvi Susanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by STIH Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh