TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP WANPRESTASI DALAM HAL HUTANG PIUTANG

Jon Hendri, Khoiri Khoiri


Jon Hendri(1*), Khoiri Khoiri(2)

(1) Politeknik Bengkalis
(2) STAIN Bengkalis
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Kaselan S.Hut has lent money to Abdul Wahid bin Kosmol with the amount of money of Rp. 162,000,000. But abdul wahid bin kosmol wanprestasi until finally to the court but in the trial, the “majelis hakim”  did not consider the willingness shown by abdul Wahid to pay off the debts to kaselan. The problem of the study was how the judges’s  legal considerations in deciding cases Number 1372 K / PDT / 2008 and how about a way to prove the case Number 1372 K / PDT / 2008. Furthermore, the method of this journal was the type of normative research, the source data obtained from three parts of Primary Legal Material, the decision of the Supreme Court and the “Perdata" case No. 1372 K / PDT / 2008, secondary law materials from books and “hukum tersier”. From the results, its can be explained that the “majelis hakim mahkamah agung” in conducting examination of cases Number 1372 K / PDT / 2008 has been through legal procedures as defined by the law. However, in giving legal consideration in deciding the judgment only based on the validity of the agreement made by both parties, regardless of the "eksepsi" filed by the defendant, because the defendant also has good willingness and proven by the payment of the debt in several times. In reviewing the instruments of evidence the “majelis hakim mahkamah agung” only concerns for the evidence presented by the plaintiff, whereas the witness evidence presented by the defendant is not a part of assessment of the “majelis hakim”.


Keywords


Judicial Review, Default, Accounts Payable

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku-Buku

Ahmadi Miru, Hukum Kontrak dan Perancangan Kontrak, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2007

Ahmadi Miru, Sakka Pati, Hukum Perikatan, Jakarta, Rajawali Pers, 2008

Retnowulan Sutantio, Iskandar Oeripkartawinata, Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek, Bandung, Mandar Maju, 1997

S. Marbun, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Pekanbaru, UIR Press, 1992

Salim HS, Pengantar Hukum Perdata Tertulis (BW), Jakarta, 2008

Subekti, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Jakarta, PT. Arga Printing, 2007

Sudikno Mertokusumo, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2006

Afnil Guza, UUD 1945 Setelah Amandemen, Jakarta, Asa Mandiri, 2009

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

(HIR) RBg

KUH Perdata

Putusan No. 1372 K/Pdt/2008 PN.BKS

Putusan No. 95/PDT/2007/PTR

Putusan No.1372/K/PDT/2008/MA

Laporan Polisi No. Pol: LP/11/K/I/2006/SPK/ tanggal 21 Januari 2006




DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v3i2.22

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Jon Hendri, Khoiri Khoiri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cendekia Hukum is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published by STIH Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh