ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN PERNYATAAN PAILIT BAGI DEBITOR TERHADAP KREDITOR PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN

Umul Khair


Umul Khair(1*)

(1) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The research and discussion of the problems as outlined in this scientific work is done with the aim of knowing which legal provisions apply to the creditors holding the Mortgage Rights in the case of the decree of declaration of bankruptcy, considering there are two different legal provisions, namely Bankruptcy Law Number 37 of 2004 and Insurance Rights Act No. 4 of 1996. This research is a Yuridi Normative research. Data obtained through literature research. The purpose of library research is to obtain secondary data. Primary data obtained through library research, then the data were analyzed qualitatively. From the result of the research, it is known that the Commercial Court judge in determining the decision of bankruptcy statement based its decision on the provisions of Law No. 34 of 2004, and the judges use legal principle of lex posteriori derogate legi priori to determine which legal provisions should be applied. Thus, both the bankrupt debtor and the creditor are subject to the provisions of bankruptcy, so that the holder of the mortg who has the position of the preferred creditor can only exercise his / her right of execution of the burden of the mortgage for a period of two months after a ninety-day suspension period since the bankruptcy decision was pronounced.


Keywords


Due to Law, Debtor, Creditor, Deposit Rights

Full Text:

PDF

References


Buku

Fuady, Munir, 2002, Hukum Pailit 1998 Dalam Teori dan Praktek, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Kartono, 1985, Kepailitan dan Pengundurna Pembayarann, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2002, Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Mertokusumo, Sudikno, 2001, Penemuan Hukum Sebuah Pengantar,Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Satrio, J, 2000, Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Situmorang, Victor M., Hendri Soekarso, 1994, Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia, Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Sjahdeini, ST. Remy, 2004, Hukum Kepailitan, Memahami Failissementsverordening Juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1998, Pustaka Utama Grafiti, Jakarta.

Sjahdeini, ST. Remy, 1999, Hak Tanggungan: Asas-asas, Ketentuan-ketentuan Pokok Dan Masalah Yang Dihadapi Oleh Perbankan, Alumni, Bandung.

Soekardono, R, 1982, Hukum Dagang Indonesia Kapita Selekta, Rajawali, Jakarta.

Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo, 1988, Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta.

Subekti, 1980, Poko-pokok Humum Perdata, Intermassa, Jakarta.

Suyudi, Aria dan Eryanto Nugroho, dan Herni Sri Nurbayanti, 2004, Kepailitan Di Negeri Pailit, Dimensi, Jakarta.

Usman, Rachmadi, 2004, Dimensi Hukum Kepailitan Di Indonesia, Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Yani, Ahmad dan Gumawan Wijaya, 2002, Seri Hukum Bisnis, Kepailitan, Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 Tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Banda-Benda Yang Berkaitan Dengan Tanah.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v3i2.24

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by STIH Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh