THE DISTINCTION LAW OF PROCEDURE OF CORRUPTION CASE AND THE GENERAL COURT IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

Sukmareni Sukmareni, Roni Efendi, Riki Zulfiko


Sukmareni Sukmareni(1*), Roni Efendi(2), Riki Zulfiko(3)

(1) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhamadiyah Sumatera Barat
(2) Fakultas Syariah IAIN Batusangkar
(3) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Barat
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The Corruption Crime Court which based on Article 5 of the corruption Court Law has the authority to examine, adjudicate and decide on the corruption crime cases, money laundering crimes that was initiated by corruption crime and criminal acts that are expressly stipulated in other laws that considered as corruption act. The existence of sovereignty possessed by the State gives rise to jurisdiction (the authority to judge) in regulating the needs of the state both internally and externally. As a sovereign country, Indonesia has jurisdiction in resolving internal and external problems. There are three questions of the research; 1) What is the procedural law of the General Court in the Indonesian criminal justice system? 2) What is the procedural law of the Corruption Crime Court in the Indonesian criminal justice system?, 3) What is the difference between the procedural law of the Corruption Crime Court compared to the law of the General Court in the Indonesian criminal justice system ?.This research is hoped that the procedural laws used in the General Courts and the Corruption Crime Courts will be known, as well as the differences in the procedural laws used in the two Courts. This research is descriptive, using a normative juridical approach, especially the legal approach, used are secondary data as the main legal material in the form of laws relating to the procedural law of general courts and Corruption Crime courts. and qualitative analisis. Based on the research, it was found that differences in the procedural law of Corruption Crime courts compared to general court procedural law in the Indonesian criminal justice system were seen in the independence  of the Corruption Crime court institutions and the material that became the authority and the judicial process with the composition and members of the Panel of Judges consisting of career judges and ad hoc judges. division of duties for the presiding judge and its members, the period of time for the examination of the Corruption Crime and the evidence used, as well as their secret registrations which are also special in nature.

Keywords


Procedural Law; Corruption.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Muchlis Hasan, (2017) Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Fungsi Panitera Dalam penyelesaian Perkara Pidana, Jurnal Al Hikam, ISSN 2089-0974, Volume 1 No 3, 2017

Ahmad Mujahidin, (2007). Peradilan Satu Atap di Indonesia,. PT Refika Aditama: Bandung.

Artidjo Alkostar. (2013). Korupsi Sebagai Xtra Ordinary Crime, Makalah, Training Pengarusutamaan Pendekatan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia Bagi Hakim Seluruh Indonesia.

Debby Natalia. (2015). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Perluasan Alat Bukti Penyadapan Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lex Crimen Vol.Iv/No.1/No.1/Jan-Mar/20151441, Hlm 144, 149

H. Nurdin. (2019) Eksistensi Hakim Ad Hoc Pada Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Sistem Kekusaan Kehakiman Meraja Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, Juni 2019

Igm Nurdjana, (2010). Sistem Hukum Pidana dan Bahaya Laten Korupsi “Prespektif Tegaknya Keadilan Melawan Mafia Hukum”,. Pustaka Pelajar: Yogyakarta.

Kurniasanti, Joko Setiyono, (2020). Penanggulangan Kejahatan Perompakan Laut Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional, JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Volume 6 Nomor 1, September 2020 e-ISSN: 2580-1678 dan ISSN: 2355-4657 Open Access:

M, Yahya Harahap, (2009). Hukum Acara Perdata, Siar Grafika; Jakarta.

M. Agus Santoso. (2012). Kemandirian Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Di Indonesia, Yustisia Vol.1 No. 3 September - Desember 2012

Nico Ngani, (2012). Metode Penelitian dan Penulisan Hukum, Pustaka Yustitia,

Nurhayani, (2015) Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia , Jurnal IUS, Hukum dan Keadilan, E ISSN: 2447-815X P-ISSN: 2303-3827, Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum Iniversitas Mataram, Vol 3.Nomor 1 (2015)

Rikhi Benindo Maghaz. (2019). Permasalahan Penuntutan Terhadap Pelaku Penyalah Guna Narkotika di Wilayah Hukum Kejaksaan Negeri Padang, JCH (Jurnal Cendikia Hukum) Volume 4 Nomor 2 Maret 2019 e-ISSN :2580-1678 dan ISSN : 2355-4657

Sri Ayu Astuti. (2017). Perluasan Penggunaan Bukti Elektronik (Evidence of Electronic) Terkait Ketentuan Alat Bukti Sah atas Perbuatan Pidana di Ruang Mayantara (Cyberspace) Pagaruyuang Law Jurnal Vol 1 No 1 Juli 2017

Suwardi, Pelaksanaan Asas Peradilan Cepat Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Terhadap Penerapan Pasal 29 Undang-Undang Nomor 46 Tahun 2009 Di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Pontianak) https://media.neliti.com/ media/publications/10679-ID-pelaksanaan-asas-peradilan-cepat-dalam-perkara-tindak-pidana-korupsi-studi-terha.pdf,

Tata Wijayanta dan Ari Hernawan. (2014) Studi Evaluatif Peran Hakim Ad Hoc Dalam Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Yogyakarta, Jurnal Yustisia Vol. 3 No. 1 Januari - April 2014.

Mudzakkir, (2011). Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Tindak Pidana Biasa Penanganannya Luar Biasa (Corruption Court: Common Crime With Extraordinary Reduction) Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia , Vol 8 No 2. Juni 2011, Hlm 31, https://e-jurnal.peraturan.go.id/index.php/jli/article/view/360/242).

Kajian Pengadilan Khusus Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang dilakukan oleh Kemitraan dan LIPI, Jakarta, 2008, hal.3-4. dalam Topo Santoso, Urgensi Pembenahan Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance, Kementerian Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia R.I. Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Puslitbang Jakarta, 2011




DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v6i2.337

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by STIH Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh