LEGAL LIABILITY ON ADMINISTRATIVE TORT: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW PERSPECTIVE

Muhammad Farizka Sisma, Zakki Adlhiyati


Muhammad Farizka Sisma(1), Zakki Adlhiyati(2*)

(1) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(2) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


The development of judicial power brings some changes. One is the evolution of administrative law related to the object of administrative dispute, which embraces factual action. Thus, the administrative tort was also affected by this change. This writing aims to understand the government's liability on the administrative tort and the regulation of onrechtmatige overheidsdaad before and after the enactment of Law Number 30/2014 on government administration. The legal research method reveals that the government's liability on administrative tort is based on the origin of the authority (attribution, delegation, or mandate). Initially, the administrative tort done by the government was regulated by the article of 1365 Civil Law, but in 2014 it was also stipulated in the Government Administration Law. In addition, The Law of Government administration broadens the limitation of administrative decisions and makes the administrative court legally able to examine the administrative tort.

Keywords


KTUN; Factual Action; Lialibilty; Onrechmatige Overheidsdaad.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrianto, Bagus Oktafian, Xavier Nugraha, and Nathanael Grady. 2020. “Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014.” Negara Hukum 11 (30): 43–62.

Anggara, Sahya. 2018. “Hukum Administrasi Negara.” CV Pustaka Setia.

Asimah, Dewi, Zainal Muttaqin, and Dewi Kania Sugiharti. 2020. “Implementasi Perluasan Kompetensi Ptun Dalam Mengadili Tindakan Faktual (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad/Ood).” Acta Diurnal 4 (1): 152–70.

Bimasakti, Muhammad Adiguna. 2022. “Penjelasan Hukum (Restatement) Konsep Tindakan Administrasi Pemerintahan Menurut Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 11 (1): 64. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.11.1.2022.64-92.

Cohen, Morris L, and Kent C Olson. 1992. Legal Research. Fifth Edition. United States: West Publishing.

Hadjon, Philipus M. 1987. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum Dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Bina Ilmu.

HR, Ridwan. 2020. Hukum Administrasi Negara. 16th ed. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Ilham, Ach Nadzirun. 2022. “Peran PTUN Sebagai Perlindungan Hukum Kepada Masyarakat Atas Tindakan Hukum Pemerintah Dalam Perspektif Negara Hukum.” Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum 28 (9): 4507–22.

Indonesia, MA. 2018. Putusan No 03/PDT.G/2018/PN Mjk.

———. 2019. Putusan No 22/Pdt.G/2019/PN Gsk.

———. 2022a. Putusan No 53/Pdt.G/2022/PN Sbg.

———. 2022b. Putusan Nomor 86/Pdt.G/2022/PN Unr.

Jurubeba, D.F.D.A. 2022. “‘The King Can Do No Wrong’: An Investigation into the True Meaning of the Maxim in the Evolution of Anglo-Saxon Law.” Revista General de Derecho Administrativo 2022 (60).

Keputusan Presiden Nomor 52 Tahun 1990. n.d.

Kulik, Marek, and Maciej Błotnicki. 2021. “Petty Offences in Poland Between Criminal Law and Administrative Law.” Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava: Časopis Za Teoriju i Praksu Javne Uprave 21 (3.): 457–88.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2022. Penelitian Hukum. 17th ed. Jakarta: Kencana.

Moh Gandara. 2020. “Kewenangan Atribusi,Delegasi Dan Mandat.” Khazanah Hukum 2 (3): 92–99. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v2i3.

Pandeiroot, Eugenia Gloria Esther. 2021. “Upaya Administratif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara Di Tinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.” Lex Administratum 9 (2).

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2005. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Putra, Fani Martiawan Kumara. 2017. “Tanggung Gugat Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Bentuk Pembatalan Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah.” Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 26 (2): 1–31.

Putra, Muhammad Amin. 2020. “Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara Yang Berpotensi Sebagai Objek Engketa Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 3 (1).

Ridwan. 2022. “Pengujian Tindakan Faktual Dan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Oleh Pemerintah Dalam Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 11 (1): 89–108. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMHU.2022.v11.i01.p07.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. 2019. “Restatement on Judicial Jurisdiction in Administrative Tort.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun 2 (2): 165–90. https://doi.org/10.25216/peratun.222019.165-190.

Suriadinata, Vincent. 2018. “Asas Presumptio Iustae Causa Dalam Ktun: Penundaan Pelaksnaan Ktun Oleh Hakim Peradilan Umum.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 2 (2): 139–52.

Thahira, Atika. 2020. “Penegakan Hukum Administrasi Lingkungan Hidup Ditinjau Dari Konsep Negara Hukum.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 5 (2): 260. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v5i2.229.

Tutik, Titik Triwulan. 2012. “Pengantar Hukum Tata Usaha Negara.” Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka Publisher.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. n.d.

Wahyuni, Fitri, Aris Irawan, and Siti Rahmah. 2021. “Criminal Liability for Performers of the Persecution of Religious Figures in Indonesia.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 7 (1): 107. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v7i1.358.

Watung, Maximus. 2018. “Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad Dalam Praktek Peradilan Negara Hukum Indonesia (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Manado Nomor: 415/Pdt. G/2015/PN. Mnd Tanggal 19 Mei 2016).” Lex Et Societatis 6 (1).




DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v8i2.592

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by STIH Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh

 Indexing by