THE PROBLEM OF INSTALLATION OF ELECTRONIC DETECTION DEVICES ON PERSONS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN

Virgie Kesfian Alifa, Beniharmoni Harefa


Virgie Kesfian Alifa(1*), Beniharmoni Harefa(2)

(1) Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
(2) Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Act No. 17 of 2016 pertaining to the PERPU No. 1 of 2016 pertaining to the second amendment to the Law No. 23 of 2002 on Child Protection is being considered as the number of cases of sexual violence against children increases annually. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the penalties for those who sexually assault children. Government Regulation 70 of 2020 regulates using electronic detection devices as a secondary penalty. However, since their enactment until now, there has been no judge's decision determining the other party's liability for the installation of this electronic detection device. This is due to the fact that the regulation itself contains numerous flawed instruments. This study aims to identify the problems and potential solutions associated with installing electronic detection devices on perpetrators of sexual violence against children. This research leads to an examination of normative legal law, with data gathered through document studies. PP 70/2020's rules for the application of the installation of electronic detectors contain a number of flaws with respect to a number of instruments, as revealed by the research results. This issue will then be compared to the regulations of several countries that have implemented it, such as the Netherlands, England, and the United States so that a solution can be found to apply penalties for the installation of electronic detection devices, specifically how to operate the device using GPS technology and the form of the tool in the form of an electronic bracelet attached to the leg of the perpetrator of sexual harassment against children.

Keywords


Electronic Detectors; Problems; Possible Solutions.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Christiansen, K. O. (2017). Some Considerations on the Possibility of a Rational Criminal Policy . UNAFEI.

Daris Warsito, D. S. (2018). Sistem Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahguna Narkotika. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2562

Fauzi, R. (2019). Pelaksanaan Penanganan Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan Dan Pencabulan Terhadap Anak Di Polsek Empat Angkat Candung. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 5(1), 173–184.

Formicola, J. (2016). The Politics of Clerical Sexual Abuse. Religions, 7(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel7010009

Gies, S. V. (2012). Monitoring High-Risk Sex Offenders With GPS Technology : An Evaluation Of The California Supervision Program Final Report. Decelopmen Group.

Harefa, B. (2020). Kapita Selekta Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak . CV Bumi Utama.

Hassan, C., Rani, A., Idris, A., & Saufi, S. (2022). Theoretical Perspectives on Electronic Monitoring and Police Supervision Order as Crime Prevention Modalities in Malaysia. International Journal Of Academic Research, 12(11), 154–165.

Hidayat, F. M., & Sulistyowati, H. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Sanksi Pidana Kebiri Pada Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Anak Berdasarkan PERPU Kedua Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. DELICT Jurnal Hukum Pidana, 6(2), 39–47.

I Noviana. (n.d.). Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak: Dampak dan Penanganannya. Sosio Informa.

Irwansyah. (2020). Penelitian Hukum. Mirra Buana Media.

Khanza, F. T., & Murti, M. A. (2022). Potensi Pelanggaran Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat terhadap Delik Penghinaan Pemerintah dalam RKUHP. . Jurnal Of Studia Legalia, 3(Vol. 3 No. 01 (2022): Journal Of Studia Legalia).

Kintan, A. (2022). Kebijakan Hukuman Kebiri Kimia Dan Pemasangan Alat Pendeteksi Elektronik Kepada Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Uin Prof. Kh Saifuddin Zuhri.

KPAI. (2021a). Bank Data Perlindungan Anak 2021. KPAI.

KPAI. (2021b). Data Kasus Pengaduan Anak 2016-2020. KPAI.

Lazuardi, A., & Pribadi, M. A. (2022). Concept Of Retractable Consent In Minister Of Education’s Regulation Regarding Sexual Violence On Campus. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 7(2), 209–227.

Leksono, I. D. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Alat Pendeteksi Elektronik Sebagai Sanksi Tindakan Yang Diberikan Kepada Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak. Universitas Brawijaya.

Mahmudan, A. (2022). Kasus Kekerasan Anak Paling Marak di Indonesia pada 2021, . DataIndonesia.Id.

Moleong, L. J. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nabilla, F. (2022). Penerapan Pengumuman Identitas Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak. Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta.

Ozguven, E. E., & Ozbay, K. (2015). An RFID-based inventory management framework for emergency relief operations. Transportation Research, 5(7), 166–187.

PN Depok. (n.d.). Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara Pengadilan Negeri Depok.

Rosdayana. (2021). Pemasangan Alat Pendeteksi Elektronik sebagai Sanksi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual terhadap Anak. Heylaw Edu.

Rosenberg, I. B. (2018). Involuntary Endogenous RFID Compliance Monitoring as a Condition of Federal Supervised Release. Journal YALE J.L TECH , 331.

Sakdiyah, F., Setyorini, E. H., & Yudianto, O. (2021). Model Double Track System Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaannarkotika Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009. Jurnal Yustitia, 22(1).

Sakdiyah Fasichatus, Setyorini Erny Herlin, & Yudianto Otto. (2021). Model Double Track System Pidana. Jurnal Yustitia Universitas Madura Pamekasan, 22(1).

Santoso, H. A. (2021). Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Teori Gustav Radbruch Dalam Putusan Pkpu. Jatiswara, 36(3), 272–288.

Setiawan, K., & Wibowo, A. (2019). Analisis Penerapan Penjatuhan Sanksi Tindakan Kebiri Kimia Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan Seksual Anak Ditinjau Dari Sudut Hak Asasi Manusia Pelaku Dan Korban. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 2(1), 769. https://doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5260

Soekanto, S., & Mahmudji, S. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Normtif, Suatu Tinjauan Singkat . Raja Grafindo Persada.

Umar Cindrawati S, Sambali Selviani, & Mohede Noldy. (2021). Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Dalam Penerapan Hukuman Tambahan Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual Terhadap Anak Berdasarkan Pasal 81 Uu No.17 Tahun 2016. Lex Crimen, X(2).

Utami, N. R. (2021). Kejari Depok: Guru ngaji cabul bisa dituntut pemasangan alat pendeteksi elektronik. Detik.Com.

Vika Azkiya Dihni. (2022, January 27). KPAI: Aduan Anak Jadi Korban Kekerasan Fisik Mendominasi Pada 2021. Databoks.

Wahid, A., & Irfan, M. (2001). Perlidungan Terhadap Korban Kekerasan Seksual : advokasi atas hak-hak asasi perempuan. Refika Aditama.

Wiyono, R. (2022). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Indonesia . Sinar Grafika.

yla bmw. (2022, January 20). 14.517 Kasus Kekerasan Anak Terjadi Sepanjang 2021. CNN Indonesia.




DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v8i2.646

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by STIH Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh

 Indexing by