DEBTORS LEGAL CERTAINTY POST CONSTITUTIONAL COURT’S DECISSION NO 18/PUU-XVII/2019 CONCERNING PARATE EXECUTION FOR FIDUCIARY GUARANTEE OBJECTS

Bhatara Eri Satya M, Atik Winanti


Bhatara Eri Satya M(1*), Atik Winanti(2)

(1) Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
(2) Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


After the publication of PMK No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019, it essentially canceled the parate execution for the object of fiduciary guarantees over the debtor's control. However, until now, parate executions are still being carried out to resolve disputes between debtors and creditors. This research aims to examine the legal certainty of debtors and the legal consequences of PMK Decision No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 in cases of partial execution of fiduciary collateral objects. This research method is normative law with a statutory approach, and the main data is secondary data. The results of this research: the legal protection given to debtors if the execution process continues after PMK No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 can take legal action as an appeal as a stance to oppose the court's decision on a judge's decision which is deemed not to provide justice. The debtor can also take criminal legal action if the execution is still carried out using coercion because he has fulfilled the criminal offense. The impact of PMK Law No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 on the legal certainty of debtors in cases of parate execution, the object of the fiduciary guarantee is to conditionally cancel the parate execution. However, many execution parate cases after the publication of PMK No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 indicates that there is no legal protection for debtors as well as legal certainty regarding the application of the execution parate regulations. This further reduces the debtor's legal certainty because the judge's view of the two cases of execution parate for the object of fiduciary collateral did not consider execution parate as an unlawful act.


Keywords


Debtor; Fiduciary; Legal certainty; Creditors; Execution Parate.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad, & Amiruddin, U. (2022). Aspek Hukum Pidana Terhadap Tindakan Debt Collector Dalam Penarikan Paksa Objek Perjanjian. Jurnal Jatiswara, 37(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29303/jtsw.v37i2.390

Budi, S. (2017). Permohonan Eksekusi Kepada Pengadilan Negeri Berkaitan Dengan Perjanjian Fidusia Terhadap Jaminan Yang Digelapkan. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 3(1), 100–107.

Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Peradaban.

Hamzah, R., & Adinda, F. A. (2022). Eksistensi Norma Tentang Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Keluarnya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu/Xvii/2019. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 2(1), 81–92.

Heriawanto, B. K. (2019). Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Berdasarkan Title Eksekutorial. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 27(1), 54–67.

Ibrahim, J. (2012). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia Publishing.

Karelina, N. (2022). Implikasi Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu/Xvii/2019 Dan Penegasannya Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2/Puu-Xix/2021 Terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Dan Perumusan Klausula Perjanjian. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An, 5(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i2.738

Khair, U. (2017). Analisis Yuridis Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen Dan Akibat Hukum Jika Terjadi Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen Di Indonesia. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 3(1), 33–45.

Koto, I & Faisal. (2021). Penerapan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Pada Benda Bergerak Terhadap Debitur Wanprestasi. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 4(2), 774–781. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v4i2.739

Kusumawati, S., & Kelib, A. (2019). Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia dalam Akad Murabahah Pada Perbankan Syariah. Notarius, 12(1), 386–397. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/notarius/article/view/27734

Ma’rifah, N. (2022). Kepastian Hukum terhadap Kreditur Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 dan Nomor 2/PUU-XIX/2021. Notary Law Journal, 1(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.23

Mamudji, Sri & Soekanto, S. (2013). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Raja Grafindo Persada.

Manurung, S. P., Chrismanto, K., & Wilopo, N. (2021). Mereduksi Praktik Eigenrichting dan Menyeimbangkan Kedudukan Hukum Para Pihak dalam Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 6(2), 284–305. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/jic.v6i2.3197

Marzuki, P. M. (2009). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Maulidi, M. A. (2019). Menyoal Kekuatan Eksekutorial Putusan Final dan Mengikat Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 16(2), 340–362. https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1627

Syam, M & Mannas, Y,A. (2022). Kedudukan Parate Eksekusi Pada Jaminan Fidusia Dengan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 18/Puu-Xvii/2019. Adhaper : Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 8(1), 149–165.

Nainggolan, H. V., Kamello, T., Purba, H., & Leviza, J. (2023). Penerapan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No.18/PUU- XVII 2019 dalam Putusan Pengadilan Terkait Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia. Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, 2(4), 365–372. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56128/ljoalr.v2i4.155

Poesoko, H. (2007). Perate Execute Obyek Hak Tanggungan, Inkonsistensi,. Konflik Norma dan Kesehatan Penalaran Dalam UUHT. Laksbang Akademika.

Prasetyo, E. S. (2020). Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konsitusi Nomor 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Terhadap Pelaksanaan Eksekusi Lembaga Jaminan. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Refleksi Hukum, 5(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2020.v5.i1.p43-62

Rumawi, Basuki, Udiyo, Mellisa Towadi, S. (2022). Parate Executie dalam Fidusia Menurut Ratio Decidendi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(3), p 557 (554-579). https://doi.org/DOI: https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1933

Sanjaya, D. B., & Tamsil. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 2 / Puu-Xix / 2021 Bagi Penerima Jaminan Fidusia ( Kreditur ). Jurnal Vonum, XX(XX), 107–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v0i0.49412




DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v9i1.752

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Published by STIH Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh

 Indexing by