DANANTARA (INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTION): AN INDONESIAN COMPETITIVE LAW PERSPECTIVE
Upita Anggunsuri(1*), Shafira Hijriya(2)
(1) Universitas Andalas
(2) Universitas Andalas
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study analyzes Danantara (Investment Management Institution): An Indonesian Competition Law Perspective. This research endeavors to answer the following questions: How is Danantara's independence from a governance perspective, and what challenges does Danantara face in creating inter-institutional and cross-sectoral relations from the perspective of business competition law in Indonesia? This study employs a normative juridical method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The study concludes that Danantara has to implement GCG principles (Transparency, Accountability, Responsibility, Independence, Fairness) to manage State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) and investments. However, the enactment of Law No. 16 of 2025, there are several articles may affect Danantara's independence and potentially give rise to abuse of power, namely Article 3F point g, which stipulates that Danantara, in the process of formulating the work plan and budget of the investment and operational holding company, must consult with the House of Representatives (DPR), and Article 4A point 3 show that the mechanism for capital participation in the context of establishing state-owned enterprises must obtain approval from the DPR. The cross-sectoral dominance of Danantara's authority creates opportunities for certain parties to exploit legal loopholes to commit acts that could lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. Articles 25, 26, and 27 of Law No. 5 of 1999 and Article 86M of Law No. 1 of 2025 show that certain parties may abuse authority through the unfair centralization of cooperative affiliations in addressing the monopoly rights granted to Danantara, which may result the centralization of cooperative affiliations between BUMN and business partners become a crucial matter in building public trust for the realization of fair business competition.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alhady, I., Arieftiara, D., & Lastiningsih, N. (2021). Does board of commissioners independence still relevant in tax avoidance monitoring? International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(5). https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i5.1263
Al Qadasi, A., & Abidin, S. (2018). The effectiveness of internal corporate governance and audit quality: the role of ownership concentration – Malaysian evidence. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2017-0043
Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Konstitusi Dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan MKRI 2005.
ButarButar, M. M. F., & Sari, A. K. (2025). Danantara sebagai Entitas Investasi Negara: Kajian Yuridis terhadap Status dan Pengawasannya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan. Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v5i2.1536
Daro, N. M., & Harris, F. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Badan Pengelola Investasi Daya Anagata Nusantara (Danantara) Jika Terjadi Kerugian dalam Pengelolaan Investasi Danantara. Arus Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.57250/ajsh.v5i2.1473
Defilania, O., & Silalahi, W. (2025). Badan Pengelola Investasi Daya Anagata Nusantara: Peluang Dan Tantangan Dalam Reformasi Ekonomi Indonesia Daya Anagata Nusantara Investment Management Institution: Opportunities and Challenges in Indonesian Economic Reform. JIIC: JURNAL INTELEK INSAN CENDIKIA, 2.
Hukunala, S. V. (2025). Eksistensi Danantara dari Aspek Good Corporate Governance. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5(2).
Ibrahim, jhonny. (2008). Teori dan Meteologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayu Media Publishing.
Jaiyen, T., Aimim-Tham, S., Nurmandi, A., & Mutiarin, D. (2020). How do ethics and transparency practices work in Thailand’s local governments? International Journal of Public Sector Performance Management, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpspm.2020.107767
Jalilian, H., Kirkpatrick, C., & Parker, D. (2007). The Impact of Regulation on Economic Growth in Developing Countries: A Cross-Country Analysis. World Development, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.09.005
Jałocha, B., Krane, H. P., Ekambaram, A., & Prawelska-Skrzypek, G. (2014). Key Competences of Public Sector Project Managers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.029
John, K., & Senbet, L. W. (1998). Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking and Finance, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4266(98)00005-3
Lakshan, A. M. I., & Wijekoon, W. M. H. N. (2012). Corporate Governance and Corporate Failure. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(12)00079-2
Ludwig, P., & Sassen, R. (2022). Which internal corporate governance mechanisms drive corporate sustainability? Journal of Environmental Management, 301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113780
Marzuki, P. M. (2016). Penelitian Hukum, Edisi Revisi, Cetakan Ke-12. In Jakarta: Kencana.
Nik Mahmod, N. A. K. (2013). GOOD GOVERNANCE AND THE RULE OF LAW. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 4. https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls.4.2013.4559
Nugroho, A. A., Juanidi, A., Kaylani, A., Danendra, A. A. G., Armando, A., Pratama, B. W., Nur, D., Yosefa, D., Nazmuzzaman, E., Hapsari, F., Nurviani, P., Retno, W., Muadiya, R., Purnomo, R. R., Kiptiyah, S., Ahmad, T., Arsad, T. A., Iskandar, V., & Yusnidar, Y. (2011). Negara dan Pasar dalam Bingkai Kebijakan Persaingan. Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Republik Indonesia.
Pietersz, J. J. (2018). Prinsip Good Governance Dalam Penyalahgunaan Wewenang. SASI, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v23i2.107
Pranava Rasahugan, V., & Khalil, S. (2022). Systematic Literature Review on Private Security Governance by Government. Journal of Applied Security Research, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/19361610.2021.1883398
Rossouw, J., & Styan, J. (2019). Steinhoff collapse: a failure of corporate governance. International Review of Applied Economics, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2019.1524043
Sudjono, A. C. (2023). Do Good Corporate Governance and Whistleblowing Systems in Bank Industry Effectively Support Fraud Detection and Prevention? Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v8i1.296
Ting, S. H., Murudi, T., & Chuah, K. M. (2020). Framing of the 1Malaysia development berhad (1mdb) financial scandal: Politicising by mainstream and alternative newspapers before and after change of government. SEARCH Journal of Media and Communication Research, 12(2).
Vithiatharan, V., & Gomez, E. T. (2014). Politics, economic crises and corporate governance reforms: Regulatory capture in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2014.923634
Wallis, J., & Rizvi, S. (2023). A New Institutional Economic Perspective on Alternative Governance Mechanisms at the Local Government Level. Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/02601079211036841
Young, S. B. (2009). The ethics of corporate governance: The North American perspective. International Journal of Law and Management, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/17542430910936664
DOI: http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v11i2.1365
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by STIH Putri Maharaja Payakumbuh
Indexing by
